Sold
Sold
Coordination between the exchange file and the investor's own tax advisor or CPA, covering data handoff, Form 8824 timing, and basis questions.
Explore
Assemble a complete Missouri 1031 exchange file, from QI agreements and identification notices to settlement statements and CPA handoff.
ExploreReplacement property identification support for Missouri exchanges, covering identification letters, rule selection, and the 45-day filing.
Explore
Run a Missouri 1031 identification window as a procurement calendar with candidate sourcing, scoring, and a signed written notice on deadline.
ExploreForm 8824 is where a like-kind exchange gets reported to the IRS for the tax year the relinquished property transferred, and the form is only as easy to complete as the underlying transaction record is organized. A Missouri exchange file built with dates, parties, and property descriptions already matched up saves the CPA from reconstructing that timeline from raw closing documents.
The form asks for a description of both the relinquished and replacement properties, the dates each was transferred, whether either party was related to the taxpayer, and the realized and recognized gain on the transaction. Preparing that information in advance means confirming property addresses match across settlement statements, title documents, and the identification notice, since inconsistent naming between documents is one of the more common sources of preparation delay.
Every date on the form should trace back to a specific document: the relinquished property closing date to its settlement statement, the identification date to the written notice, and the replacement closing date to its own settlement statement. Related-party questions apply if the investor bought or sold to a family member or a controlled entity, and those relationships should be flagged early since they carry additional reporting requirements.
A CPA-ready package for a Missouri exchange typically includes the following organized together in one file:
A Missouri exchange involving a relinquished property near St. Louis and a replacement near Springfield, Columbia, or in a rural county will still report on the same form, but the supporting documents may come from different title companies and closing agents on different schedules. Keeping a single running list of which document is expected from which source reduces the chance that one piece is still missing when the CPA sits down to prepare the return.
A multi-asset exchange, such as one combining a St. Louis industrial building with a DST allocation, adds another layer since each piece of the replacement may need its own description and value entry on the form rather than a single combined figure.
Once the record is organized, it goes to the CPA well before the filing deadline, with a short summary noting anything unresolved, such as a settlement statement still pending from a late-closing replacement property. The CPA determines the actual gain, basis, and reporting positions on the return, and this preparation work exists to make that determination faster and more accurate, not to substitute for it.
If either side of the Missouri exchange involved a related party, such as a family-owned entity that sold the relinquished farmland or purchased the replacement property, the record should flag that relationship clearly, since related-party exchanges carry a holding period requirement and closer reporting scrutiny than an arm's-length transaction. That flag belongs in the file from the start rather than surfacing for the first time when the CPA reviews the closing documents.
The record should also carry forward basis information from the relinquished property, since the replacement property's basis for future depreciation depends on that carryover figure combined with any additional value or debt taken on in the exchange. Missing basis history from an earlier exchange makes this calculation harder to complete accurately, so any prior exchange documentation the investor still has on file, even from a transaction several years old, should be gathered alongside the current year's closing records before the CPA package is finalized.
It is filed with the return for the tax year in which the relinquished property was transferred, even if the replacement property closes early in the following tax period under the 180-day rule. A CPA can confirm the correct filing year for a specific transaction.
Yes, exchanges involving a related party carry additional reporting requirements and a holding period that must be met to avoid disqualification. Investors should flag any related-party sale or purchase to their CPA as early as possible.
Settlement statements from both the relinquished and replacement closings, the qualified intermediary's exchange agreement, and a record of the identification dates are the core documents. A boot calculation worksheet speeds up the review if any cash or debt reduction was involved.
The form itself does not change based on geography, but gathering documents from multiple title companies and recorders can take longer, so building the record early helps. A single tracking list for expected documents keeps that process organized.
The taxpayer's CPA or tax preparer is responsible for the return itself, including the gain, basis, and boot figures reported, and for confirming the transaction qualifies for like-kind treatment in the first place. This coordination role organizes the supporting records and does not provide tax advice or complete the form.